Search for: "In Re: Corrigan v." Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
 And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
 And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
Today's opinion from the California Supreme Court sounds exactly like what I would say to one of my first-year law students who was confused about res judicata.Justice Corrigan's opinion is careful, patient and slow. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm by Madelaine Lane
The Court declined to exercise superintending control in Brady v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
(The caveats in Justice Corrigan's opinion on this point are similarly sensible. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
 Once we're there, it seems more important to me to expand upon the analysis rather than a (somewhat distracting) discourse on the particular path through which we wound up in our present predicament. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
We know from the Supreme Court's opinion in Florida v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm by Matthew Nelson
The Michigan Supreme Court took substantive action in six cases: In re P.M. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
 Justice Corrigan says that when a belief is "divorced from the circumstances," it's delusional. [read post]