Search for: "In Re: Engle Cases"
Results 1 - 20
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 11:46 am
"Engle prodigy" cases, as they're widely known, include thousands of claims spun off from a decertified class action against the nation's tobacco companies, with the first Engle prodigy trial dating back to 2008. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:56 pm
The motion involves Florida residents who smoked cigarettes and want to rely on factual findings made by the trial court in the Engle case. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
Engle, 672 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) and Engle v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 611 F. 3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2010), that the Engle findings were res judicata only in the sense of establishing certain facts, not as establishing certain elements of a cause of action. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 611 F. 3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2010), that the Engle findings were res judicata only in the sense of establishing certain facts, not as establishing certain elements of a cause of action. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 5:57 pm
This case is no exception. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Re-proving negligence established by the Engle case will not have to be addressed in the individual trials. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
The case didn't die there, though; as the Court in Martin stated, the Florida Supreme Court "allowed certain jury findings from the class action to have res judicata effect in any subsequent lawsuits by individual class members seeking damages from the defendants. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in In re Engle Cases, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 4435893 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 2:26 am
One wonders about the viability of Engle v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Otherwise, the Florida Supreme Court’s statement in Engle III that the Phase I approved findings were to have res judicata effect in trials involving former class members would be meaningless. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:43 pm
Engle, 467 F.3d 1038, 1041 (C.A.7 2006); In re Arbitration Between Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:43 pm
Engle, 467 F.3d 1038, 1041 (C.A.7 2006); In re Arbitration Between Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:16 pm
Also coincidental: Mol’s wife is demanding that Engle be removed from the case because the candidacy means Engle has a “clear and direct conflict of interest. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:53 am
“RJR simply pleads for this Court to use this case as a vehicle to rehear and nullify Engle,” attorneys wrote. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:34 am
The recent cases for which punitive damages were awarded are part of a long line of Florida tobacco litigation referred to as “Engle progeny cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Even if the plaintiffs’ lawyers funded a study, they can claim, with plausible deniability, that they funded the study in connection with another client’s case, not the client who is plaintiff in the case in which discovery is sought. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
We look forward to providing good advice for your case. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
See, e.g., In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Products Liability Litigation, U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
Branch (In re Bank of New Engl. [read post]
