Search for: "In Re: Executive Office of the President, Petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
” As he continued later in the opinion, “Petitioner’s effort to construct an immunity from suit for unofficial acts grounded purely in the identity of his office is unsupported by precedent. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm by Harry Graver
As such, petitioners seek respective re-hearings before new CCA panels because their previous panels were composed in violation of law. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
Trump has, in his brief 95 days in office, succeeded in blurring the distinction between the office of the Presidency in general and the fact of his presidency in particular. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Circuit heard oral argument in In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The TRAI Ordinance is said to have been brought in to make way for the appointment of an ex-Chairperson of TRAI in the Prime Minister’s Office. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
 by re-nominating and re-confirming the military judges to be CMCR judges. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am by Ilya Shapiro and Trevor Burrus
Because the executive power is vested by the Constitution exclusively in the president, any officer who exercises that [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
IN THE NEWS President Donald Trump issued a “Buy American, Hire American” executive order. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
& dis. opn. of Reynoso, J.).)This writ petition came to this court on a request by petitioner Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) to stay a scheduled judgment debtor examination of its president and chief executive officer over a dispute regarding an attempt by real party Adam Rosen (Rosen) to collect supposed postjudgment interest of $462.50 on an attorney fee award of $42,203. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Blackman’s analysis struck me as quite interesting: The Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel’s memorandum justifying President Obama’s new executive action recognizes that prosecutorial discretion is not “unlimited. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
Once that director is in office, she can only be removed by the president for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Sheppard
Trump issued an executive order directing the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am by Patrick McDonnell
The president can remove a director only “for cause. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am by Steve Vladeck
In al-Nashiri I, the issue was whether the CMCR’s judges were “principal” Executive Branch officers for purposes of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, and could therefore only be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:14 am by John L. Welch
Petitioner claimed that Respondent committed fraud when it submitted a Statement of Use that was sign by a person who falsely claimed to be president of the company, when she was not an officer at all, and who signed the statement based on use of the mark by a third party. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’reOfficers. [read post]