Search for: "In Re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm by Tom Lamb
This second / separate Fosamax multidistrict litigation (MDL) case is IN RE: FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:44 pm by Tom Lamb
Keenan, who is presiding over IN RE: FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL 1789, where the vast majority of those pending ONJ cases are filed: The Court has reviewed the joint letter submitted by Defendant Merck and the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee ("PSC"), and is in agreement that this MDL is ripe for remand and transfer. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:47 am by Michelle Yeary
  In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation (Boles), 2011 U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:25 am by Tom Lamb
For some analysis of this March 23, 2022 Opinion for the federal court Fosamax MDL lawsuits -- captioned In Re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation -- we turn to this New Jersey Law Journal article, "Ending a 14-Year Battle, Merck Wins Dismissal of Suits Linking Fosamax to Fractured Femurs", by veteran legal reporter Charles Toutant: The ruling brings an end to roughly 500 suits in litigation… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:06 am
The broader litigation in the same court is In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, No. 06-1789. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Tom Lamb
Merck & Co., 06-cv-4110, which is one of the hundreds of pending Fosamax lawsuits in In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1789, U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 4:49 am
One of Bexis' Vioxx pals (he's not sure who, since it was sent by fax and cover page was removed - next time use PDF) at Hughes Hubbard passed it along, and when Bexis returned to reality, he shared.Good thing, too.The decision, now available electronically, is In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2008 WL 58890 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Tom Lamb
This Graves case is just one of the hundreds of Fosamax osteonecrosis (ONJ) lawsuits that are part of In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1789, U.S. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 1558697 (D.N.J.) [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:51 pm by Tom Lamb
  This "second" Fosamax multidistrict litigation (MDL) case is IN RE: FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:07 am by Tom Lamb
In more detail, the so-called federal court Fosamax MDL is properly titled: In re: Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:25 am by Tom Lamb
From Judge Keenan's February 4, 2011 Order issued in IN RE: FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION: The FDA first approved Fosamax for the treatment of osteoporosis on September 29, 1995. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:02 pm by Tom Lamb
This Secrest case if one of the hundreds of federal court lawsuits that are combined in In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1789, U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:08 am by Michelle Yeary
  In re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation (Secrest v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm by Tom Lamb
Merck & Co., one of the hundreds of Fosamax jaw injury lawsuits that are combined in the federal court MDL titled In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation (MDL 1789, U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
Merck faces about 1,000 ONJ product liability suits over Fosamax that involve similar allegations. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm by Tom Lamb
(No. 1:06-CV-05513-JFK), which is one of the hundreds of pending Fosamax lawsuits in In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1789, U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:26 am
" The case is In Re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation 06-md-01789 in U.S. [read post]