Search for: "In Re: Grand Jury Subpoenas" Results 61 - 80 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S. 683, 702 (1974) (pretrial subpoenas duces tecum); In re Grand Jury Sub­poena, 696 F. 3d 428, 432 (CA5 2012) (grand jury subpoe­nas); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 616 F. 3d 1186, 1201 (CA10 2010) (same). [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 7:56 am
In an early computer evidence case - In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 846 F. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
  A grand jury subpoena directs its recipient to bring the described evidence to the grand jury at some future place and time. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:19 pm
Memo From the Defense Bar to the Justice Department: Henceforth, if you subpoena our clients to appear before a Grand Jury, we’ll make a deal with you. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:25 am
  In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, No. 04-3138 (D.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:38 am
Penelope Pether, Villanova University School of Law, has published "Regarding the Miller Girls: Daisy, Judith, and the Seeming Paradox of in re Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller," in 19 Law and Literature: The New Exceptionalism: Law and Literature Since 9/11 Symposium 187 (2007). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 am by Bexis
  So sayeth the Ninth Circuit in In re: Grand Jury Subpoenas Served on White & Case LLP, Lieff, Cabraser, Heinemann, K&L Gates LLP, & Nossman, LLP, No. 10-15758, slip op. (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Jeff Kuntz
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:07 am
Beyond the hoopla however, when does a witness who gets served with a subpoena to appear before the grand jury lawyer up? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in the sealed case In re Grand Jury Proceedings: 13-2498-01A An excerpt: A venerable legal Latinism, lex non cogit ad impossibilia, teaches that the law does not compel the impossible. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:31 am by Ken White
You promised a second chapter of the federal grand jury lawsplainer! [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:21 am by Jeff Gamso
  And, not incidentally, because it had the power to subpoena and question witnesses, the grand jury was able to investigate and root out government corruption and misconduct.That was then. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:19 am
On rehearing, a unanimous panel changes course in In re Grand Jury Matter #3, No. 15-2475 (Jan. 27, 2017), holding in this “out-of-lane” case that appellate jurisdiction survived the return of an indictment against a target-turned-defendant challenging a document's presentation to the grand jury. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
As a first order of business, she wants to address a few preliminary issues to “make sure that we’re all on the same page. [read post]