Search for: "In Re: Hackler"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
See In re United Distillers plc., 56 USPQ2d 1220, 21 (TTAB 2000) (“Hackler” held to be a rare surname despite 1295 listings in phone directories). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
See also, In re United Distillers plc, 56 USPQ2d 1220 (TTAB 2000), where HACKLER was held to be a rare surname despite the 1,295 listings in the telephone directory. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:50 am
«Le commerçant doit présenter ces renseignements de manière évidente et intelligible et les porter expressément à la connaissance du consommateur. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Employees might also be surprised to find that they end up in the office more with unlimited PTO than with a limit on the number of days they’re allowed to take off. [read post]
