Search for: "In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 1:28 pm
The jury found Exxon liable under New York tort law for contaminating City-owned wells in Queens by its release of the chemical methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), which Exxon used as a gasoline additive from the mid-1980s through the mid-2000s, and whose use New York State banned as of 2004. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:37 pm
In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litig., No. 04-5974-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:41 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp., 04-cv- 3417, grouped with others in the master-file case, In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation, 00-cv-1898, U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Products Liability Litig., 2021 WL 3371938, No. 1:00-1898, MDL 1358, No. 14 Civ. 6228 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 10:32 am
See In re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability Litigation, case number 1:00-cv-01898. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:24 am
" The caption of this case is In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
Sept. 6, 2001) (granting in part and denying in part motion to dismiss master complaint); In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation, 175 F. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
In the toxic tort context, across the Hudson River from New Jersey, New York litigants look to In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Products Liability Litigation, 379 F. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Prods. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
* In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 3720406 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Goetzmann, 315 F.3d 457, 460 (5th Cir. 2002); In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 193 F.3d 781, 794 (3d Cir. 1999); Prohias v. [read post]
