Search for: "In Re: Radmax, Limited"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2023, 10:11 am
” In re Radmax, Ltd., 720 F.3d 285 (5th Cir. 2013). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
But Judge Sutton's representation still result in important questions unaddressed by the memo—if a particular judicial district does adopt this policy, could it be potentially retroactive and result in the re-assignment of currently-pending cases? [read post]
