Search for: "In Re: Schering Plough Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2008, 1:05 am
See In re Schering-Plough Corp., FTC File No. 071-0132. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:38 am
[New Jersey Law Journal/law.com; In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:27 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345, (Fed. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:14 pm
See In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
Last year, we had Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:28 pm
A tip of the old cyberhat - and not for the first time - to Alan Modlinger at Lowenstein Sandler for passing along to us the latest good news on the off-label promotion front - dismissal (with leave to replead under Twombly) in In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:49 am
Schering- Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:25 am
SEC Investigating Schering-Plough Trades: The SEC is investigating trading of Schering-Plough shares ahead of the announcement of its merger with Merck & Co., people familiar with the matter said. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345 (Fed.Cir. 2003). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:28 am
In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:23 pm
May 16, 2012), and In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:20 pm
This case is an antitrust challenge to an agreement settling patent litigation between defendant-appellee Schering-Plough Corp.2 ("Schering") and defendant-appellee Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:04 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:50 pm
In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 7:39 pm
The settlement follows a ruling last month ordering Bristol Myers-Squibb, AstraZeneca Plc and Schering-Plough Corp. to pay damages for allegedly overcharging on drugs by inflating the "average wholesale price" (AWP). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:30 am
See Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:52 pm
In 2005, in Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
