Search for: "In Re: Sealed Case, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Obama, et al., 76 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
Google trial in the District of Columbia will go ahead.That case has already impacted the California app store case because of the information the three dozen state AGs obtained through discovery in the D.C. case.Google has moved for summary judgment against the DOJ and the state AGs, who have meanwhile filed their opposition briefs, which are sealed for the time being. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:21 pm
The National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) today asked the three plaintiffs in the court case ACLU et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Alberta Securities Commission et al. 2014 ABCA 273Securities RegulationSummary: The Alberta Securities Commission, in a decision reported as Re Holtby, 2013 ABASC 45, found G. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:51 pm
Allstate Insurance Company, et al., Case No. 06-4091, filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, names eight insurance companies and five insurance adjusting companies as defendants. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:17 am
Last week, in Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
Picking up the 7th Circuit opinion yesterday in Pisciotta et al v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:34 am
Document Title: Motion to Reconstitute Official Creditors' Committee Bankruptcy Case: In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:39 pm
In the case of Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
Citing In Re Ruschig et al., 379 F.2d 990 (CCPA 1967), the Board held that where the patent’s disclosure describes the exclusion of a broad genus, claims to embodiments which exclude particular species are only supported if the disclosure offers some guidance or “blaze marks” to guide the skilled artisan towards excluding that particular species. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
District Court Judge recently issued in a civil case: Ellora's Cave Publishing, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Weidman et al., v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:54 am
"
Verni et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
A landmark case in the struggle for equality was Westminster School Dist. of Orange County et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
"].September 16, 2015 - 3 PM: In re Fashion Box S.P.A., Serial No.86051465 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below, for various men's clothing items, in view of the registered mark RED SEAL for "Carry-all bags, leather pouches, rucksacks, duffle bags, travel bags, tool bags sold empty, backpacks, purses, trunks, suitcases, garment bags for travel, billfolds, wallets, harnesses, leather bags, leather bag laces, valises"].September 22, 2015 - 11 AM: Mini… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:57 am
They’re really, really serious. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:49 pm
On Friday night, lawyers for an Algerian national at Guantanamo Bay sought to put some of those issues before the Court in a new appeal in the case of Mohammed, et al., v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 4:00 am
Big' There is a sealing order in this case, in the context of a ‘Mr. [read post]
