Search for: "In Re: United States of America, Petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent further testified that she never spoke to petitioner about “how long the trip [to the United States] [wa]s going to be,” nor did she “know that [she] was going to stay” in the United States ahead of time. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Backstrom On October 13, 2017, Petitioners League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. filed a motion to expedite briefing and hearing in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:03 pm
    Procedural HistorySecure Axcess LLC brought this suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, charging Nintendo and [the "Retailers"] with patent infringment. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Alex Ely
’s] customers) reasonably believed to be located outside the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Petitioner Retrobrands, as its name implies, is in the business of re-launching abandoned brands. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-6866, for Setser. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Obama (relisted after 3/18 Conference) Docket: 10-775 Issue(s): Whether petitioners have a habeas corpus right to be brought into the United States and released, outside the framework of the fed­eral immigration laws and in contravention of specific statutory restrictions on their transfer to the United States, when they have been granted habeas corpus re­lief and received appropriate offers of resettlement from two different countries… [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:09 pm by Scott McKeown
PTAB judges may not communicate with superiors on case specifics except as allowed by the Code of Conduct for Unites States Judges. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Yet, before the Supreme Court, the Petitioner's opening brief barely mentioned "Office under the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:51 am
March 8, 2018 - 11 AM: In re Dead Bird Brewing, LLC, Serial Nos. 87140389 and 87140417 [Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark DEAD BIRD BREWING COMPANY (standard characters) [BREWING COMPANY disclaimed]  and the logo shown below, for beer, in view of the registered mark DEADBIRD for wines].March 15, 2018 - 10 AM: In re Society of Health and Physical Educators, Serial No. 87107590 [Phantom mark refusal of SHAPE XXXX for educational journals, educational services, and… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:22 am by Stefanie Levine
” The United States would retain its current authority to bring false marking claims and recover up to $500 per article. [read post]