Search for: "In Re: White v."
Results 41 - 60
of 3,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2024, 7:22 am
At 1:38, the words on screen are "Mitt Romney and the Republican Party... plan to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:42 pm
In a unanimous decision in the case, Palmore v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:19 am
In McGehee v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 8:47 pm
The 21-page ruling in US v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
We wonder why they didn't take ATL readers' (free) advice and call it the White Guys With Asian Girls School of Law. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:46 am
Prescott v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:47 am
But now that we're in San Jose/Oakland/San Francisco, you're fired. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am
When you see things like that, you know you’re going forward. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm
Access a White House blog post (click here). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
”); In re Spina, 975 F.2d 854, 856(Fed. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:23 pm
Building on the trend in which consumer class actions increasingly adopt a doctrine of presumed reliance, Northern District Judge Jeffrey White recently certified a nationwide class in Wolph v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
Earlier in the week the court found no right to not wear a gun in public in New York, upholding a law requiring "every free white man" to carry a firearm in public. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:42 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
IPBiz notes that in Chevron v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
” (White, supra,202 Cal.App.3d at pp. 869–870; see also In re Tate (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 756, 764–765; People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Who do you think they’re going to vote for? [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:28 am
GSA (D.D.C.) -- concluding that GSA failed to perform adequate search for communications between agency and White House concerning renovation of FBI headquarters..Heartland Alliance for Human Needs & Human Rights v. [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 8:57 am
Circuit heard oral arguments in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm
It's interesting to re-read the case and to listen to oral argument (which you can do here).The case, per Justice White, held: Under the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.Here, a state police officer shot and killed Garner as he was fleeing the scene of the… [read post]
