Search for: "In Re Adoption of SS"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 11:27 pm
Between 5 April 2021 and 4 May 2023, Auto & General entered into approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance.[1] Customers were issued with a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) which stated that insureds must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis).[2] ASIC submitted the Notification Clause was unfair within the meaning of ss 12BF(1)(a) and 12BG(1) of the Australian Securities… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:20 pm
Certaines grandes entreprises en ont conscience et ont adopté cette stratégie. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Les parties reprennent devant la Cour, pour l’essentiel, le débat qui a eu lieu en première instance. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:08 am
Michael McLaughlin is V.P. of Alliances and Commercial Operations for SS&C Blue Prism. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
Appeals Criminal Law: Stays; ss.10(b) & 7; s. 24(1) StandingR. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 1:17 pm
Lorsque le fournisseur remet au client un logiciel spécifique, il faut adopter la prémisse qu'il lui confère une simple autorisation d'utiliser le produit sans lui transférer ses droits. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Create a clear view of automation goals: Businesses should understand the value of the intelligent automation tools they’re adopting and how to best implement them. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
They're at it again! [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
Au moment de son engagement, l'intéressée n'avait pas de compétence en matière de programmation informatique. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
The EAT dismissed his appeal: the ET had been wrong to find that his belief in Genesis 1:27 and his lack of belief that it was possible for a person to change his or her sex/gender did not amount to a protected characteristic for the purpose of ss 4 and 10 of the Equality Act 2010, but it had not been wrong in finding that the measures adopted by the respondents were necessary and proportionate to meet a legitimate focus on the needs of potentially vulnerable service users and on… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:08 am
Sauf disposition contraire de la LTAF, la procédure est régie par les dispositions de la PA (art. 37 LTAF). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 2:09 am
Gautam Moorjani is Head of Product of SS&C Blue Prism. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
“It can no longer be doubted that as a matter of general customary international law a head of state will personally be liable to be called to account if there is sufficient evidence that he authorised or perpetrated such serious international crimes. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 2:47 pm
Le 18 mars 2011, le Parlement a adopté la loi fédérale sur la réglementation du prix du livre, contre laquelle un référendum a été lancé. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:03 pm
We’re standing by and ready to assist! [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:51 am
The CJEU enlarges the free movement of decisions coming from third states under the Brussels Ibis Regulation In the judgment C-568/20, the CJEU held that a decision of a court of an EU Member State which merges a judgment of a third state is enforceable under Articles 39 ss of the Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
If the resident deems their property and situation unsafe, we would advise they contact any local authority of their choice for immediate temporary re-housing. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Brière, 2022 QCCDPHA 14 [49] Quoique la sanction qui aurait pu être imposée à l’issue de l’audition soit pertinente, le Conseil ne doit pas commencer son analyse par une comparaison entre cette sanction et la recommandation conjointe[28]. [50] Il doit plutôt débuter son analyse avec le fondement de la recommandation conjointe, incluant les bénéfices importants de cette dernière pour l’administration de… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
