Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion of Governor Civil Rights"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Department of Public Health (2003), that it was a violation of the state constitution for the state to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples, the state senate passed a civil union bill—a marriage-equivalent status with a different name—and asked the court for an advisory opinion as to whether its actions had satisfied the judicial mandate. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Under Section 4(1)(c) of the Right to Information Act (RTI Act), every public authority has the duty to publish all relevant facts while announcing decisions which affect the public. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:29 am
In 2010, they were charged and convicted by a federal jury of a coverup and civil rights violations. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
When did the Court stop giving advisory opinions to Governors? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
, Why Should Human Rights Campaign Applaud The Lawyers Who Fight It? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
McHughDocket: 10-638Issue(s): Whether the claims of a dual-status National Guard technician alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are jurisdictionally barred by the doctrine of Feres v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
Recognition of out-of-state marriages - MarylandI posted yesterday on the advisory opinion (94 Op. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The agreement also includes a $3 million civil penalty and an additional $6 million on other environmental projects. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Williams (09-466), below, was re-scheduled for review at the January 22 conference. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
— EPA News Release, November 25, 2009 Verizon Wireless has agreed to pay a $468,600 civil penalty to settle self-disclosed violations of federal environmental regulations discovered at 655 facilities in 42 states. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:22 pm
And let us not forget that despite the 20th Century's great civil rights achievements, when America catches a cold, black America gets pneumonia. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
New York Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:15 pm
Realizing the unpopularity of his position, Dukakis said that his hands were tied by an advisory opinion of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Defendant must be resentenced because of the partial acquittal, under the advisory-guideline scheme created by the Booker decision subsequent to his original sentence. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Law360) … [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:35 am
He continued saying that Florida was among the last states to have automatic rights restoration and he was asked while campaigning for Governor if he was considering automatic rights restoration. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
(Five concurring opinions and dissent) U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
bs Act violations under a color of official right theory, it must satisfy the "property from another" and "with his consent" requirements of 18 U.S.C. section 1951(b)(2). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
In contrast, for those opposed to the greater expansion of such media into federal courts, particularly at the district levels, it is argued that such media coverage and camera exposure infringes on a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and also perhaps upon the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. [read post]
