Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion of Governor Civil Rights"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Defendant must be resentenced because of the partial acquittal, under the advisory-guideline scheme created by the Booker decision subsequent to his original sentence. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Law360) … [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:35 am
He continued saying that Florida was among the last states to have automatic rights restoration and he was asked while campaigning for Governor if he was considering automatic rights restoration. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
(Five concurring opinions and dissent) U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
bs Act violations under a color of official right theory, it must satisfy the "property from another" and "with his consent" requirements of 18 U.S.C. section 1951(b)(2). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
In contrast, for those opposed to the greater expansion of such media into federal courts, particularly at the district levels, it is argued that such media coverage and camera exposure infringes on a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and also perhaps upon the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Schwartz, No. 05-4978 In the context of plea agreements and criminal sentencing, the government may withdraw a downward departure motion when a defendant agrees not to violate the law and a written plea agreement reserves to the government the right to withdraw the motion upon that occurrence. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
In fact, as was set forth in the OCA's answer to the petition, the health insurance cause of action must be dismissed for failure to join a necessary party because the real party in interest is the president of the Civil Service Commission, who negotiates health insurance packages on behalf of the Judiciary. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 8:08 am
Not according to the Florida Supreme Court's Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee. [read post]
