Search for: "In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Lit."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
The supposed distinction advanced by the panel is illusory, and contrary to post-Daubert decisions, and the Congressional revision of the statute, which requires attention to whether “the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and, the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
