Search for: "In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
When Prince died in 2016, Condé Nast contacted AWF for permission to re-publish the 1984 illustration in a special issue devoted to Prince. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
So while we’re hesitant to say that the skinny-label has been resuscitated, we’re not ruling out the possibility of resurrection. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Schuck, Agent Orange on Trial: Mass Toxic Disasters in the Courts (1987). [2] Michael D. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Third, the trial court in Cook had to ignore the federal judiciary’s own reference manual’s warnings about the inability of ecological studies to provide causal inferences.8 The Cook case is part of an unfortunate trend to regard all studies as “flawed,” and their relative weights simply a matter of argument and debate for the litigants.9 Abilify Another example of sloppy reasoning about confounding can be found in a recent federal trial court decision, In… [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 6:50 pm
Shiga toxin is one of the most potent toxins known to man, so much so that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lists it as a potential bioterrorist agent (CDC, n.d.). [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 8:11 am
Boundary litigators take note. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
The articles were designed to promote General and create positive associations between it and quality products. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 1:29 pm
Fla. 2001); see also In re Agent Orange’ Prod. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
In In re Fibreboard Corp., 893 F. 2d 706, 711-12 (5th Cir. 1990), the court rejected a class action approach to litigating asbestos personal injury claims because risk could not substitute for findings of individual causation: “That procedure cannot focus upon such issues as individual causation, but ultimately must accept general causation as sufficient, contrary to Texas law. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
The decision comes from In re Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litig., No. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Of course, the Bazemore litigation predates the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert by several years. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Professor Green has served as the co-reporter for the American Law Institute’s Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Attorney's fees -- Action arising from Department of Administrative Hearings' finding that AHCA's withdrawal of an application for a home health care facility license, due to what the AHCA perceived as an incomplete application, was incorrect -- Error to award applicant attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111 despite favorable order from DOAH -- Where, at the time the withdrawal was issued, AHCA knew of… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
” Given that litigation often involves unusual situations outside both the statistical and prescriptive “norms” of ordinary life, the abandonment of extreme deference to expert witnesses as the ultimate arbiters of reasonableness is a significant advance in the evolution of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
In re Interstate Medicaid Patients at Good Samaritan Nursing Center, 415 F.Supp 389 (JPML 1976). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
In re Interstate Medicaid Patients at Good Samaritan Nursing Center, 415 F.Supp 389 (JPML 1976). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
” In re “Agent Orange” Prod. [read post]
