Search for: "In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 10:26 am
’ Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 110 n.16 (2d Cir. 2010) (collecting cases); see In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir. 2003) (‘Willful blindness is knowledge, in copyright law . . . as it is in the law generally. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Three issues were in play in this case: (1) whether the safe harbors—which are a creature of federal copyright law—may be raised as a defense to allegations of infringement involving pre-1972 sound recordings, which are not within the scope of federal copyright law; (2) whether a service provider can be charged with “red flag” knowledge of infringement if its employee views a video containing all or almost all of a popular sound recording; and (3) whether… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
If a takedown is challenged, once in a while they might have to litigate that. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:58 pm
See In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 655 (7th Cir. 2003). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
JC: Most litigation over knowledge standard—actual and red flag. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
I can't believe we're still wasting our time on this issue in 2011. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
(In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (2003)). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
It was held In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (2003), cited in Arista Records v Doe 3 (2010) and recently in Tiffany v eBay that “willful blindness is knowledge in copyright law…as it is in the law generally. [read post]
