Search for: "In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 10:26 am
’ Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 110 n.16 (2d Cir. 2010) (collecting cases); see In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir. 2003) (‘Willful blindness is knowledge, in copyright law . . . as it is in the law generally. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Three issues were in play in this case: (1) whether the safe harbors—which are a creature of federal copyright law—may be raised as a defense to allegations of infringement involving pre-1972 sound recordings, which are not within the scope of federal copyright law; (2) whether a service provider can be charged with “red flag” knowledge of infringement if its employee views a video containing all or almost all of a popular sound recording; and (3) whether… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
If a takedown is challenged, once in a while they might have to litigate that. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:58 pm
See In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 655 (7th Cir. 2003). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
JC: Most litigation over knowledge standard—actual and red flag. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
I can't believe we're still wasting our time on this issue in 2011. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am
No Criminal Liability for Secondary Copyright Infringement The basic premise of this argument is that in the civil context, liability for indirect infringement derives from the common law, not the Copyright Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
(In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (2003)). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
It was held In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (2003), cited in Arista Records v Doe 3 (2010) and recently in Tiffany v eBay that “willful blindness is knowledge in copyright law…as it is in the law generally. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
-directed site to carry out acts that constitute” copyright infringement. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Some more detailed thoughts and questions about the bill: Comparison to SOPA and PROTECT IP SOPA and PROTECT IP provide for both actions by the Attorney General and actions by copyright holders, the OPEN Act provides only for actions by copyright holders. [read post]
