Search for: "In Re American Commercial Lines, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 David Kaplan, Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc.: Use tech fingerprinting and scanning in enforcement. [read post]
In other words, the emerging marketplace is encouraging commercial-source disclosure where it makes sense, and before adopting any regulations, the FTC should consider drawing a regulatory line between native advertising – which can be easily regulated – and native content – which may not. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
’ – but who’s next in line for resale royalty entitlements? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
July 1, 2009); In re Bausch & Lomb Inc., MDL No. 1785, 2007 WL 3046682 (D. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:14 am by Terry Hart
Random House, Inc. and New Era Publications International ApS v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:53 am by Brian Liu, Raquel Leslie
Other companies sanctioned by SAMR include online retailers JD.com Inc., Suning Ltd. and Baidu Inc. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
Native advertising that is closer to pure content than pure commercial speech may deserve greater or even full First Amendment protection, which would carry significant implications for government regulation[2]. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a piece for The Hill, Melanie Zanona discussed the regulatory errors behind the recent, well-documented airport security debacles that have caused hours-long lines, reportedly leading to more than 70,000 passengers missing flights on American Airlines alone. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
Borland Intern., Inc., 49 F. 3d 807, 818 (1st Circuit 1995). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
Most famously, in Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
But I think they've got an even bigger problem: we're having a debate they obviously did not have when they refunded the money. [read post]