Search for: "In Re Anonymous" Results 1 - 20 of 6,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2007, 6:16 am
The experience has led me to the following conclusions:We're getting a lot more contributions;The lack of distinct identities makes it difficult and annoying to parse/respond to anonymous comments; andThe level of civility shows signs of heading into XOXO territory.Thoughts? [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Derek Bambauer
It discusses how statistical techniques have made it increasingly easy to re-identify anonymized data sets, and to apply that information to other identification problems (for example, taking information from one’s movie ratings on Netflix and using it to figure out someone’s Facebook friends). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:14 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
A difficult technical issue for organizations will be whether the anonymized data could be combined with information by a third party to re-identify the individual. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:57 am by Nancy Rapoport
  (I'm guessing that the commenters have never been on the receiving end of any of the drivel that they're posting. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
   A recent example is a  case decided on July 12, 2010,  In re: Anonymous Online Speakers, Anonymous Online Speakers, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:56 am by Media Law Prof
Musetta Caruso Durkee, University of California, Berkeley, Law School, has published The Truth Can Catch the Lie: The Flawed Understanding of Online Speech in In Re Anonymous Online Speakers, in volume 26 of the Berkeley Technology Law Journal (2011). [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:58 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
But there’s nothing wrong with wanting to stay anonymous, no matter what you’re doing. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:21 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
In re Anonymous Online Speakers, — F.3d —, 2010 WL 2721490 (9th Cir. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:40 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 People tell us they’re sometimes worried about sharing information with apps and want more choice and control over what personal information apps receive. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:13 am
Well, it turns out that it was not as anonymous as the poster believed. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:44 am
When tribunal witness requests anonymity In re Officer L and Others House of Lords “On an application by potential witnesses for anonymity at a public inquiry, the appropriate test was whether a preexisting risk of death to the witness would be materially increased if he were required to give evidence without anonymity. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
They’re participating, they’re parenting but they’re not using the regulatory construction that we all understand. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:54 pm by Odia Kagan
If the dataset was anonymized, it would have been transformed such that re-identification was impossible, no matter what other information the attacker has to hand. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
  In Re Guardian News & Media ([2010] UKSC 1) the Court overturned anonymity orders in respect of a number of individuals who had been subject to freezing orders. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
TechRadarPro: “If you’re looking for the best free privacy software to help you browse the web anonymously, then you’ve come to the right place, as we’ve listed the top choices to help protect your privacy. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:33 pm
by Jason Fischer If you're a fan of Showtime's adult series "Secret Diary of a Call Girl" (or even if you aren't), you may be interested to know that the real-life anonymous author of the blog and book that inspired the series went public earlier this week. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:30 am
We're told that "A journalist's job is to dig, expose secrets (as long as they matter). . . [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:17 pm by Paul Horwitz
We are essentially mulling over legal ideas, and our speculations may or may not be correct given that we’re giving a first impression; the equivalent of going into each other’s office and talking it over rather than putting in the research, speaking to a client, and then providing a well-founded (ie. sufficient under FRCP Rule 11) advice." [read post]