Search for: "In Re Apple Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Apple Inc. case, the Federal Circuit reaffirmed the holding in In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC that it could not review any decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB" or "Board") related to institution, including a determination whether the decision was time-barred according to the AIA statute. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 8:25 pm by Patent Docs
Procedurally, in this case, an unidentified third party filed a request for ex parte reexamination of all claims of Apple's U.S. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:39 am by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied Respondent Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) motion seeking permission to re-take the depositions of five witnesses of Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:25 pm by Peter Snyder
[JURIST] A US jury awarded Apple, Inc. $290.45 million Thursday following a re-trial in the protracted legal struggle between the American technology giant and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:33 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
In re Apple iPhone 4 Products Liability Litig., No. 5:10-MD-2188 (N.D. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There's some buzz about a non-final Office Action in an ex parte re-exam on Apple's D'677. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:34 am by John L. Welch
In re Apple Inc., Serial No. 77219819 (September 23, 2011) [not precedential].Apple did not dispute that MULTI-TOUCH is descriptive of its goods, but argued that the mark has achieved acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f).Examining Attorney April K. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:25 pm by Steve Brachmann
Apple has been preoccupied with the world of handheld electronic devices for a long time now, and they’re still devising improvements to battery systems and other utility features. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:34 pm by Florian Mueller
Should Apple's appeal fail, Apple could still bring a new FRAND determination action and further bar Google from the pursuit of injunctive relief.Apple's appeal could also re-raise its antitrust claims that Judge Crabb dismissed on summary judgment in August 2012. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:30 pm by Katherine Gasztonyi
The FTC’s allegations stemmed from an App Store feature, disclosed in Apple’s Terms and Conditions, that allowed in-app purchases for up to fifteen minutes without requiring password re-entry after the user completed a password-requiring transaction. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On July 5, 2011, Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]