Search for: "In Re Application Of" X"" Results 1 - 20 of 1,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2013, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
On July 17, 2013, the Board re-designated as precedential its January 29, 2013 opinion in the ROLEX/ROLL-X case, vacating its original decision of December 5, 2011. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
You can read the main decision on BAILII here : X v X (application for a financial remedies order) [2016] EWHC 1995 (Fam) (26 July 2016). [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:21 am by Matthew Landis
If applicable, warn your significant other of the alarm and consider buying them a small gift for interrupting their slumber. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 2:03 am by Melissa Blazejak, Editor
HR Daily Advisor: What can employers offer to Gen X workers to make sure they’re on track when it comes to retirement savings? [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 9:01 pm
A few highlights from his list are: Pressing Esc while typing in most applications pops up a list of suggested completions of the word you're typing. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
For example, these issues can discourage applicants: Only allowing applications from individuals with X years of experience, without exception. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
For example, these issues can discourage applicants: Only allowing applications from individuals with X years of experience, without exception. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
For example, these issues can discourage applicants: Only allowing applications from individuals with X years of experience, without exception. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:51 am by John L. Welch
In re Gibson Guitar Corp., Serial No. 85127067 (June 14, 2012) [not precedential].The Board first found the two marks to be highly similar in sight, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm by Mark Nowotarski
It won’t do you any good to file a provisional application for something that isn’t in a viable commercial market. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”Accordingly, said the court, the Ledbetter Act does not save Plaintiffs’ Title VII claims from the application of res judicata.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/941a3a25-6d0d-4540-a4b1-7239a06af994/14/doc/19-962_so.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/941a3a25-6d0d-4540-a4b1-7239a06af994/14/hilite/ [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:34 am by Jon Hyman
The EEOC claimed that the employer asked job applicants for a family medical history as part of its post-offer, pre-employment medical exams. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 3:38 am by John L. Welch
Applicant, the Board observed, is improperly seeking to limit the scope of registrant's broad identification, rather than provide clarity. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
 Thus if the Board of Appeal has decided that a claim set is novel, then in principle during the remitted case the novelty of those claims is not further open to question.Res judicata is a relatively simple concept in principle, but its application in practice is actually rather complex, because its extent and applicability of the doctrine are frequently questioned. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 9:01 pm
This built-in feature of Mac OS X allows you to see at once as thumbnails all open windows in all applications or even in a single application. [read post]