Search for: "In Re Application Of" X"" Results 1 - 20 of 1,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2014, 2:26 am by tracey
In re X (Adopted Child: Access to Court File)[2014] EWFC 33; [2014] WLR (D) 390 ‘Since FPR 2010 r 14.24 was not subject to the qualification that it applied only “in exceptional circumstances” there was nothing which required the same approach to apply in the case of an application under rule 14.24 (or its predecessors) as applied in the case of an application under section 79(4) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 although, given the context,… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:54 am by sally
In re X (A Child) (Reporting Restrictions: Guidance) [2016] EWHC 1668 (Fam) ‘Those applying for reporting restriction orders in family proceedings need to comply meticulously with the obligation to adequately notify the media in accordance with the FPR Practice Direction 12I—Applications for Reporting Restriction Orders and associate Cafcass practice note (paras 10, 25–28). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
On July 17, 2013, the Board re-designated as precedential its January 29, 2013 opinion in the ROLEX/ROLL-X case, vacating its original decision of December 5, 2011. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:51 am by sally
‘The legal media was quick to jump on the case of Re X (A Child – Foreign Surrogacy) [2018] EWFC 15) to highlight the reference in Sir James Munby’s judgment to the sexual relationship (or rather, the lack of one) in the marriage between the two applicants in this case of a parental order application following a surrogacy arrangement. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
You can read the main decision on BAILII here : X v X (application for a financial remedies order) [2016] EWHC 1995 (Fam) (26 July 2016). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 3:40 am by sally
In re G (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008) [2016] EWHC 729 (Fam) ‘The applicant, X, who was at all material times in a same-sex relationship with Y, was the biological mother of twins, born as a result of IVF treatment provided by a licensed fertility clinic to Y, the gestational mother and the twins’ legal parent. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:21 am by Matthew Landis
If applicable, warn your significant other of the alarm and consider buying them a small gift for interrupting their slumber. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 9:01 pm
A few highlights from his list are: Pressing Esc while typing in most applications pops up a list of suggested completions of the word you're typing. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
For example, these issues can discourage applicants: Only allowing applications from individuals with X years of experience, without exception. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
For example, these issues can discourage applicants: Only allowing applications from individuals with X years of experience, without exception. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
For example, these issues can discourage applicants: Only allowing applications from individuals with X years of experience, without exception. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:51 am by John L. Welch
In re Gibson Guitar Corp., Serial No. 85127067 (June 14, 2012) [not precedential].The Board first found the two marks to be highly similar in sight, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm by Mark Nowotarski
It won’t do you any good to file a provisional application for something that isn’t in a viable commercial market. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:35 am by sally
In re MF Global UK Ltd (in special administration); Heis and others v Attestor Value Master Fund LP and another [2013] EWHC 92 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 30 “The hindsight principle was not applicable to the determination of claims to client money for the purposes of a distribution under Chapter 7A of the Client Assets Sourcebook (‘CASS 7A’) issued by the Financial Services Authority in accordance with its powers under Part X of the Financial Services and… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:34 am by Jon Hyman
The EEOC claimed that the employer asked job applicants for a family medical history as part of its post-offer, pre-employment medical exams. [read post]