Search for: "In Re Application Of" X""
Results 41 - 60
of 1,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Doesn't the "double R" in applicant's mark predominate and serve to distinguish the marks? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:51 pm
In Re Milne Estate, 2018 ONSC 4174, the Court held that a will was void for uncertainty of subject matter and could not be admitted to probate. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:20 am
" Applicant contended that the registrant 'made a conscious decision to not list hockey gloves as part of its goods," and furthermore that the cited mark is distinguishable because of the dominant red X. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
The Statesman published a brief description of a case that attorney Bill Habern had notified me about, signalling a growing frustration by federal courts with the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles over their application of Condition X to parolees not convicted of sex crimes. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:24 pm
Siracusa has reviewed each major revision since OS X 10.0, so he’s no newcomer to OS X. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:11 am
Medicare, in pursuing recovery directly from the applicable plan, removes the beneficiary, as well as the provider or supplier, as the responsible party to initial a re-determination and all subsequent levels of the administrative process that could culminate in judicial review.Docket ID:CMS-2013-0270Topic(s):Administrative Practices and Procedures, Health Facilities, Health Professions, Kidney Diseases, Medical Devices, Medicare, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements,… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:59 pm
Frankly, we’re both skeptical. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
The reports confirm that each piece of technology included in the review operated well-within applicable the national safety standards. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
We encourage previous applicants to re-apply. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:21 am
" (The Applicant relied on In re Noll (CCPA 1976) for this proposition.) [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:22 am
TypeIt4Me now uses the MacOS X native spell-checker. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:15 pm
Or Re-Think? [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
The application is not for X, it is for X with another four letters forming an additional word – XKING. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 11:30 am
The topic of the day is “Ban the Box,” the disturbing legislative trend that prohibits employers from asking job applicants about criminal conviction histories on job applications. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 12:31 pm
Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 [read post]
18 May 2016, 3:14 am
Herrera contended that Applicant sought to register more than one mark because "the 'X' in Applicant's drawing refers to a changing single digit integer .... [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
If people start using a term to mean X, it may well -- almost by definition -- indeed mean X. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
A generic will should cost $x. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:27 am
The Board cited In re Chaganti, 2014, WL 274514, *4 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
" The Federal Circuit has said that disclosure of an alternative to X is not teaching away from X. [read post]
