Search for: "In Re Application U-2"
Results 1 - 20
of 815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 12:07 pm
Over 300 organizations have signed a letter to USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez expressing their concern with the 2 year delay in adjudicating applications for U visas, which are available to certain immigrant victims of criminal activity who have helped law... [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:26 am
In re U-Haul International, Inc., Serial Nos. 86757544, 86757575, 86757589, 86757631 and 86757635 (November 17, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
R (on the application of Rex Cart) (2) U (3) XC (Claimants) v (1) Upper Tribunal (2) SIAC (Defendants) & (1) Secretary of State for Justice (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (3) Public Law Project (Interested Parties) & (1) Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (2) Wendy Cart (Interveners) DC (Laws LJ, Owen J) 1 December 2009 [2009] EWHC 3052 (QB) The supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court, exercisable by way… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
§924(e)(2)(B)(ii), is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
" See In re Dietrich, 97 USPQ2d at 1637. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 2:20 am
Yes.(2) Will the tampons be marketed or promoted as fitting inside of a purse? [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 2:59 am
In re Northeastern University, Serial No. 87487674 (March 2, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
April 6, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Openings, Serial No. 86044043 [Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of the product configuration shown below, comprising a U-shaped channel that runs the full length of a door at its top and bottom, for "metal doors, commercial reinforced steel doors" and for "non-metal doors"].April 7, 2016 - 10:15 AM [ABA Annual IP Law Conference, Bethesda, Maryland]: Nash-Finch Company v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
Rogers, 440 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Continue reading "BREAKING NEWS: SCOTUS Opinion in re Bilsiki is out! [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Chesapeake), and one the subject of a Section 1071(b) civil action for review (U. of Alabama v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
E.g., In re Mayweather, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 11298, at *1 (PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE); In re Greenwood, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 11439, at *2 (GOD BLESS THE USA); In re Team Jesus, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 11489, at *5-6 (TEAM JESUS); see generally TMEP § 1202.04(b).Applicant maintained that there was no evidence that the term 40-0 is in widespread use, but the Board disagreed. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:40 am
In re Brunetti, Serial No. 85310960 (August 1, 2014) [not precedential].Examining Attorney Zachary R. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
Third-party registration evidence once again proved fatal to an applicant seeking to overcome a Section 2(d) refusal. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:51 am
Alabama Opposition to HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA & Design for ClothingSection 2(a) - Immoral or Scandalous:Precedential No. 34: Findng "AWSHIT WORKS" to be Scandalous, TTAB Affirms Section 2(a) RefusalSection 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses U. [read post]
29 May 2008, 8:02 am
So I think it's most topical right now, especially given that students generally send out relatively few transfer applications (usually 2-4 tops) as compared to initial law school applications. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
In re Application, supra. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Doc. 775, p. 2. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
