Search for: "In Re Application of Lamb"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 3:28 am
GFA Brands, Inc., Opposition No. 91194974 [Opposition to registration of SMART BALANCE for frozen entrees and for various snack foods and desserts, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of dilution of, the registered mark SMART ONES for various types of frozen foods, including entrees, desserts, ready-to-eat wraps, pizzas, and breakfast foods].April 30, 2014 - 10 AM: In re LAMB-GRS LLC, Serial No. 77756492 [Section 2(a) refusal to register the mark L.A.M.B.… [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
And yet the lion doth lay down with the lamb. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:35 pm
See In re LAMB-GRS LLC, Serial No. 77756492 (September 30, 2014). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:34 pm
In that case, the Examiner concluded that the mark LOVEE LAMB was deceptive for seat covers. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:23 pm
My coverage includes posts on: client experience management evangelizing legal service delivery re-booting the lawyer-client relationship fixing the legal professions broken windows The last post on this list refers to a business application of the Broken Windows Theory. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:52 pm
Except for possibly Mary’s little lamb. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:00 am
” (Wow, I just realized what a horrible name that was for a kid’s TV program about a little lamb…haha) I guess the point of this little rant is that every single one of these members of the Bar at one point passed their character and fitness evaluation with flying colors, so clearly we’re missing something. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm
IPBiz notes that there are cases in which re-drafting was NOT allowed. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm
What they view as precedent isn’t applicable to the economic situation we’re facing today. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
And — unlike the average law firm — they’re more likely to view their own business in terms of earnings-per-share than profit-per-(law)-partner. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
“Technically, they're bound by precedent. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:39 am
On May 24, 2011, in In Re Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:32 am
The other reason I'm enthusiastic about this initiative is that Brian Lamb is listed as one of the stakeholders. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:41 am
Application refused. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
We’re left with the essentials. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:00 am
However, he decided to waive that particular requirement since: there are no material differences in the consideration of the application in respect of each of the deceased; and because he also concluded that each of the applications must fail as being far outside of the exceptions to the general and important rule relating to the finality of Christian burial set out in the leading case of Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299. [3] [Re East Finchley… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
We are currently working with British Chlorophyll to develop the markers and the Wynnstay Group to develop lamb finishing feeds which include the markers. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
In fact, we're pretty confused about what the district court said and did. [read post]