Search for: "In Re Asbestosis Cases" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 1:05 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Defendants sought to have the mesothelioma lawsuit dismissed on the basis of the common law doctrine of collateral estoppel, which essentially prevents a person from re-litigating the same issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:05 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Defendants sought to have the mesothelioma lawsuit dismissed on the basis of the common law doctrine of collateral estoppel, which essentially prevents a person from re-litigating the same issue. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:37 am by Mike Gertler
Yes, it is still possible to get compensation for mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other asbestos-related diseases even if you’re not sure where or when you were exposed. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 11:21 am by Barbara Adams
  Texas defense attorneys had noticed that many (if not most)  of the 10,000 plaintiffs with silicosis cases pending in the M.D.L. had also filed claims alleging that they had asbestosis, a highly unusual combination. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:28 pm by railroadaccidentfelalawyer
Whether you’re an engineer, yardmaster, brake operator, hostlers or conductor, you may be at risk for developing mesothelioma, asbestosis, and so forth. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  More important, the opinion necessarily implies that a medico-legal diagnosis of diseases such as asbestosis or silicosis must comply with the professional standards applicable to medical opinions. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Would verdicts in exposure cases be reopened because of newly-developed cures for asbestosis or DES-related maladies?  [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:19 am by Sean Wajert
Flores had concerned a plaintiff suffering from asbestosis. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm by Schachtman
See, e.g., In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1142 (N.D. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
  A study by neutral academics showed that forty-one (41 %) percent of audited claims of alleged asbestosis or pleural disease were found by trust physicians to have either no disease or a less severe disease than alleged by the plaintiffs’ experts (for example, pleural disease rather than asbestosis). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Schachtman
– The fact that 1,587 claimants who had previously been listed as having asbestosis, with no refere [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Sean Wajert
He sued several defendants, and the case eventually settled.  [read post]