Search for: "In Re B"
Results 1 - 20
of 29,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 2:24 am
In re B (A Child) [2009] UKSC 5; [2009] WLR (D) 336 "When the court was considering a residence order application in respect of a child under s 8 of the Children Act 1989 there was no presumption in favour of a biological parent. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 2:08 pm
B. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:04 am
In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement); [2009] WLR (D) 73 “A contact order made under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court was enforceable by committal for contempt of court, and the court had jurisdiction to attach to a penal notice directed to the local authority in whose care the relevant [...] [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:30 am
Power to restrict carer's place of residence is exceptional In re B (a Child)(Relocation) Court of Appeal “The imposition by the court of a condition to a residence order restricting the primary carer's right to choose where his or her place of residence within the United Kingdom was exceptional. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:53 am
Certified B corporations are certified by the nonprofit organization B Lab. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:44 pm
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Fourth-degree burglary We are called upon in this case to determine whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support a delinquency finding that Ralph B., Appellant, was involved in fourth degree burglary in violation of Section 6-205(a) of the Criminal Law Article of the Maryland Code (2002, ... [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 2:37 am
In re B (Minors) (Contact order: Enforcement) Court of Appeal “Where a local authority was in breach of a contact order, it was enforceable by committal for contempt of court. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 10:17 am
B., appellant, contends that the court erred by purportedly considering, as substantive evidence, a cell phone video which ... [read post]
26 May 2015, 1:52 pm
Juvenile law — Illegal sentence — Minimum period of confinement On July 2, 2014, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Tyrone B., appellant, pled involved to a single count of third-degree burglary. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:16 am
In re B (a Child) (Residence order) Supreme Court "When considering an application for a residence order for a child there was no presumption in favour of a biological parent. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:34 am
In re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2009] UKSC 17; [2009] WLR (D) 365 "The test to be applied to the identification of a potential perpetrator, out of a pool of two or more potential perpetrators, who might have caused harm to a child was the balance of probabilities and that standard of proof [...] [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:15 pm
The Christian Science Monitor recently ran a story on the growing trend of socially conscious businesses forming (or re-forming) as B Corporations. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:52 am
The Christian Science Monitor recently ran a story on the growing trend of socially conscious businesses forming (or re-forming) as B Corporations. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:57 am
In re S-B (Children) (Care proceedings: Standard of proof) Supreme Court “When considering who caused injury to a child out of a pool of two or more potential perpetrators, the standard of proof was the civil standard of the balance of probabilities and that standard did not vary according the gravity of the injuries or conduct alleged. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 5:09 am
Some rejections are under 102(b), but do include an invocation of inherent properties. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:22 am
How does Re B impact on things? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
The case of B v B [2012] EWHC 1924 (Fam), decided today, contains another judicial warning upon the preparation of court bundles. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:10 am
First, the petition that the trustee filed under under Probate Code § 17200(b)(5),(b)(9). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:26 am
Re B (A Child) [2009] UKSC 5 concerned a three year-old boy who had been cared for since birth by his maternal grandmother, who was granted a residence order by consent in November 2006. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
In a separate opinion in B-K Lighting, Judge Newman writes:On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted the motion of Fresno Valves & Castings (“FVC”), and ruled that United States Patent RE 39,084, owned by B-K Lighting, is invalid on the ground of obviousness. [read post]
