Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
I did think that exchange between Justice Barrett and Sauer, the defense counsel, was the high point of the argument. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
Attorney, Sklansky was interviewed by Stanford Legal co-hosts Pamela Karlan, the Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and co-director of Stanford Law School’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, and Richard Thompson Ford, the George E. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:30 am
Gen., Re: Applicability of Federal Criminal Laws and the Constitution to Contemplated Lethal Operations Against Shaykh Anwar al-Aulaqi 12–19 (July 16, 2010); . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
I'm not even sure they're reading from the same book. [read post]
California voted to ban new diesel trucks at ports. Why did L.A. and Long Beach just add 1,000 more?
13 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
“Any further delay in the waiver process really does risk that we’re going to see more diesel trucks on the roads or working at the ports,” said Will Barrett, national senior director of clean air policy with the American Lung Assn. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
But if Trump is re-elected he will not allow the deep state to again block presidential will. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:08 am
Big corporations try to co-opt and control these communities, and politicians often promote scary narratives about technology’s dangerous influences, but users have pushed back against monopoly and rhetoric to find new ways to connect with each other [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Hallmark & Son Coal Co., 935 F. 2d 336, 342 (D.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In truth, they're best understood to stand for this far-more-modest proposition, which appears in the 1995 OLC opinion on which Trump places the most weight: “[A] statute that does not by its express terms apply to the President may not be applied to the President if doing so would raise a serious question under the separation of powers. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
Co., 2002-Ohio-2220, ¶ 15. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
” (Cites to In re Facebook, Barrett v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922 (1982). [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
In theory, the Court “has an obligation to satisfy itself … of its own jurisdiction," Steel Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 15, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization titled "The Enforcement Act of 1870: Disqualification Myths and Realities. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
We're In The Section 3 Endgame Now (1/11/24). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
