Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co."
Results 181 - 200
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Should treat right to copy as a co-equal participant in the system; otherwise competition simply retreats as rights expands. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Trump’s Committee Paying for Lawyers of Key Mar-a-Lago Witnesses MSN – Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey, and Isaac Stanley-Becker (Washington Post) | Published: 12/5/2022 Former President Trump’s PAC is paying legal bills for some key witnesses involved in the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled classified documents, obstructed the investigation, or destroyed government records. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
The Senate foolishly failed to convict and disqualify Trump, and so now he is running for re-election. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” [SPOILER: “They’re all tied for least likely to be successful. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Co. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Barrette, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392 [St. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Because of her prior participation in the Wolf case, Barrett is expected to recuse herself from consideration of it. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm
The committee will hear testimony from Barbara Barrett, the secretary of the air force, and Gen. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
There’s an entire Wikipedia page devoted to the insults he uses for adversaries and the nicknames he uses for co-conspirators. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
In theory, the Court “has an obligation to satisfy itself … of its own jurisdiction," Steel Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Judge’s Special-Master Order a Test of Trump’s Post-White House Powers MSN – Ann Marimow and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 9/6/2022 Justice Department lawyers are weighing whether to challenge a federal judge’s uncommon order to appoint an independent reviewer, called a special master, to assess more than 11,000 documents seized by the FBI from Donald Trump’s Florida residence. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
“I had a wonderful babysitter,” O’Connor told the co-authors of a book on career re-entry for women. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered clear instructions to the securities class action bar: “In assessing price impact at class certification, courts ‘should be open to all probative evidence on that question — qualitative as well quantitative — aided by a good dose of common sense.'”[3] Based on our data and analyses, five Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 claims filed against U.S. issuers during the second quarter of 2021 exhibit a complete absence of… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] In our view, the phrase "Officers of the United States" does not refer to the President. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, Master Harper of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory held that the lawyer could use the social networking site to serve court notices.1 The Facebook profiles showed the co-defendants’ dates of birth, email addresses and ‘friend’ lists and declared the co-defendants to be friends of one another. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
In his message to the Bipartisan Summit, President Obama said that, “[T]here is an increasing realization that what we’re doing is wrong. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Special Counsel Urges Judge to Crack Down Further on Trump’s Comments MSN – Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 10/25/2023 Special counsel Jack Smith argued that recent comments by Donald Trump show not only that a federal gag order should be reimposed, but the court should weigh stricter sanctions, including sending him to jail, if he keeps talking about witnesses in his case. [read post]
