Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co." Results 81 - 100 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:38 am
Ted Stevens, who lost his bid for re-election just days after a jury found that he had lied about gifts and home renovations. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013]… [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by S2KM Limited
Cynthia Barrett discussed "Post-Windsor Issues for LGBT Couples & Children" from a special needs perspective. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
Haddad reviewed sample case studies from a book she co-authors. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm by Ilya Somin
In an interesting recent post, co-blogger Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argue that President Trump cannot be impeached and convicted for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol because he was engaging in First Amendment-protected speech. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
Lawyers can immediately start using them to plan a new matter without re-inventing the wheel. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:40 pm by Ronda Muir
As we have also pointed out, ("Downsizing the Legal Industry"), Businessweek reporter Paul Barrett predicts that Dewey & LeBoeuf is just the leading edge of a “broad restructuring among some of the best known brand names in [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm by Erin Miller
Rutledge is best known, however, for his towering dissent in In re Yamashita.   [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:12 am
Less than two weeks after Disner says disagreement over strategy led to his ouster from the firm, the lawyer has asked a judge to name him "co-lead counsel" in the BAR/BRI litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
D618,678 (the ‘678 patent), 7,479,949 (the ‘949 patent), RE 41,922 (the ‘922 patent), and 7,912,501 (the ‘501 patent). [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, the en banc Fourth Circuit decided two related cases in the Foreign Emoluments Clause litigation. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Josh Blackman
My co-blogger Jon Adler raised this question, which I take to be a very serious point. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
This decision concerns an estate, known as Virginia Quay Estate, constructed by Barrett Homes at the turn of the century/millenium, across the Thames from what was then the Millennium Dome. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Plumbing Corp. v Parklot Holding Co., 44 Misc 3d 1218(A) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014]). [read post]