Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co." Results 101 - 120 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 11:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Co-blogger Steve Sachs describes the latest controversy from California: According to his official website, California Gov. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Coleman Saunders
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Hungary v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The individual defendants Donald Barrett and Robert Maihos co-own ITV Direct, Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
Under the proposed rule, shucked oysters — those that are taken out of their shells — are exempt because, for the most part, they’re cooked before they’re eaten. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
In Nebraska, Amy Coney Barrett wrote separately to condemn the stronger version of the MQD. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
Once you have shared User Content or made it public, that User Content may be re-shared by others. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
Most important of those critics was Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), who tried to row back from 69 Marina in Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 332 (LC); [2015] L&TR 1 (link to our note)* and limit the circumstances in which it could be used, but, ultimately, the Court of Appeal are binding on the UT, so we’re stuck with it. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am by Josh Blackman
I thank Adam Liptak and the NYTimes for bringing up this interesting matter./3 — Seth Barrett Tillman (@SethBTillman) November 25, 2019 [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Questioning the lawyer for Mississippi, Justice Kavanaugh purported to seek reassurance that the state was not asking for the Court to forbid abortion: “you’re arguing that the Constitution’s silent and, therefore, neutral on the question of abortion? [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
”  In a May 2011 ACC Docket article summarizing that event, Susan Hackett and her co-authors emphasized that progress will not be based on improved understanding or increased knowledge. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Code §1349, Barrett Byron Staton filed a motion for return of property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:40 pm by Ronda Muir
As lawyers, we’re oriented to a particular style of thinking—detail oriented, somewhat abstract, risk-averse, not especially emotionally intelligent, very short-term focused in terms of business activities, and with a somewhat odd presumption both that we’re more virtuous than other people and that more selfishness is usually a good thing. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
As Justice Barrett noted, you can't sue Congress to make them repeal a law; and in any case, courts don't issue "writs of erasure," stripping pages out of the Statutes at Large. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]