Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co." Results 121 - 140 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
Most important of those critics was Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), who tried to row back from 69 Marina in Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 332 (LC); [2015] L&TR 1 (link to our note)* and limit the circumstances in which it could be used, but, ultimately, the Court of Appeal are binding on the UT, so we’re stuck with it. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am by Josh Blackman
I thank Adam Liptak and the NYTimes for bringing up this interesting matter./3 — Seth Barrett Tillman (@SethBTillman) November 25, 2019 [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Questioning the lawyer for Mississippi, Justice Kavanaugh purported to seek reassurance that the state was not asking for the Court to forbid abortion: “you’re arguing that the Constitution’s silent and, therefore, neutral on the question of abortion? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Code §1349, Barrett Byron Staton filed a motion for return of property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:40 pm by Ronda Muir
As lawyers, we’re oriented to a particular style of thinking—detail oriented, somewhat abstract, risk-averse, not especially emotionally intelligent, very short-term focused in terms of business activities, and with a somewhat odd presumption both that we’re more virtuous than other people and that more selfishness is usually a good thing. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
As Justice Barrett noted, you can't sue Congress to make them repeal a law; and in any case, courts don't issue "writs of erasure," stripping pages out of the Statutes at Large. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Joe Barrett This post first appeared on the 11KBW Education Law Blog. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm by Ilya Somin
In an interesting recent post, co-blogger Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argue that President Trump cannot be impeached and convicted for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol because he was engaging in First Amendment-protected speech. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Finally, six facts in particular were left out: the names of six un-indicted co-conspirators. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sam Wong
Atkins (D), co-author of the bill, called the ruling “disappointing” and said that “more women on corporate boards means better decisions and businesses that outperform the competition. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:30 am by jonathanturley
This country is on track to repeat what happened in Germany when it was the greatest democracy going, when it elected a chancellor that then co-opted the media. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by S2KM Limited
Cynthia Barrett discussed "Post-Windsor Issues for LGBT Couples & Children" from a special needs perspective. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
Haddad reviewed sample case studies from a book she co-authors. [read post]