Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co." Results 141 - 160 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am by Mark Tushnet
(Until re-reading my comment on the article, I didn’t remember that I had actually made a version of the argument that follows twenty years ago – so at least I can’t be accused of coming up with the argument for this very occasion. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” [SPOILER: “They’re all tied for least likely to be successful. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm by jamie
Speakers at the memorial event include Chelsea Manning, Gabriella Coleman, Barrett Brown, EFF’s Cindy Cohn, Aaron Day co-founder Lisa Rein, and many more. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:51 am by Alfred Brophy
Barrett, Co-Director of the Remembering Slavery, Resistance and Freedom Project and Senior Research Associate, IHB Dr. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013]… [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
“We’re seeing it all over, medical co-pays, cost of incarceration claims, you name it. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Barrett: what about peer review/picking papers for IPSC? [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
Most important of those critics was Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), who tried to row back from 69 Marina in Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 332 (LC); [2015] L&TR 1 (link to our note)* and limit the circumstances in which it could be used, but, ultimately, the Court of Appeal are binding on the UT, so we’re stuck with it. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:37 pm by Alan J. Borsuk
“So we’re going to have to do it as mayors, because we’re really in essence the only people who are getting anything done. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
In his message to the Bipartisan Summit, President Obama said that, “[T]here is an increasing realization that what we’re doing is wrong. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
Once you have shared User Content or made it public, that User Content may be re-shared by others. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
Under the proposed rule, shucked oysters — those that are taken out of their shells — are exempt because, for the most part, they’re cooked before they’re eaten. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:05 pm by S2KM Limited
Cynthia Barrett discussed "Post-Windsor Issues for LGBT Couples & Children" - another settlement planning subject other settlement planning conferences failed to encompass. [read post]