Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co." Results 141 - 160 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2019, 10:04 am by Emma Zack
Justice Barrett based his decision on findings by the Bronx District Attorney’s Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU) that detectives from the 47th precinct had coerced Burton into falsely confessing to murdering his mother when he was just 16 years old. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Faris has been dating cinematographer Michael Barrett. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am by Mark Tushnet
(Until re-reading my comment on the article, I didn’t remember that I had actually made a version of the argument that follows twenty years ago – so at least I can’t be accused of coming up with the argument for this very occasion. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” [SPOILER: “They’re all tied for least likely to be successful. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm by jamie
Speakers at the memorial event include Chelsea Manning, Gabriella Coleman, Barrett Brown, EFF’s Cindy Cohn, Aaron Day co-founder Lisa Rein, and many more. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:51 am by Alfred Brophy
Barrett, Co-Director of the Remembering Slavery, Resistance and Freedom Project and Senior Research Associate, IHB Dr. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013]… [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
“We’re seeing it all over, medical co-pays, cost of incarceration claims, you name it. [read post]