Search for: "In Re Catts"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2008, 6:49 pm
And in rides Francine McKenna of re: The Auditors. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review [2015] UKSC 42 on whether the ECHR, art 8, was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review ([2015] UKSC 42) on whether Article 8 ECHR was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
This is one of several cases before the Supreme Court this term raising issues of privacy and the retention of information by the police (see also R (Catt) and R (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, and Gaughran v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland), and it will be interesting to see how the Court approaches art 8 in a variety of policing contexts. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:00 am
"In addition to the primary finding of equivalence between Lucentis and Avastin for visual acuity, CATT also demonstrates that PRN dosing is a viable treatment option for either of these drugs," says CATT study chair Dr. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
As their website says: “Whether you’re a lawyer or law student, or you’re just here for the messy legal drama, Strict Scrutiny has you covered. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:40 am
Catt’s rights would have been amply justified under Art. 8.2. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Rainbow Flag (Photo credit: Rev Dan Catt) Unfortunately, we’re not there yet. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:45 pm
It’s important because otherwise, the message you’re sending young women is that they can achieve professionally, or they can have a family, but they can’t do both. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
One of the drawbacks of seeing the world through SEC filings is that companies can fall woefully short when it comes to explaining just why they’re doing what they do. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Catt v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:30 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
