Search for: "In Re Clothes, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 1:44 am
In re T.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:47 am
The recently-released case In re Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:12 am
Lafayette, IN - Trademark lawyers for Coach, Inc. of New York, NY, and Coach Services, Inc. of Jacksonville, FL filed a trademark infringement suit alleging Diggz Clothing, LLC and Lori Harth of Lafayette, IN infringed various Coach trademark registrations which are registered with the US Trademark Office. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2018, Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:09 am
In re Quicksilver, Inc., Serial No. 77734610 (May 18, 2010) [not precedential].Of the five NEXIS items proffered by the PTO, two were from Australian publications, and they referred to "surf" and "couture" as two separate categories of clothing. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:41 am
" In re USCANTEEN, INC., Serial No. 76692826 (April 7, 2010) [not precedential].The Board needed only five pages to affirm the refusal [equaling Applicant's three-page appeal brief and two-page reply brief]. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:33 am
On September 3, 2010, the Board re-designated its decision in In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227 (TTAB 2010) as precedential. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
In re Farouk Systems, Inc., Serial No. 78646723 (June 19, 2008) [not precedential].The Board observed that a mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) if (1) the term misdescribes the character, quality, function, composition, or use of the goods, (2) prospective purchasers are likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods, and (3) the misdescription is likely to affect the purchasing decision.Applicant did not clarify whether its goods contain silk (it said it… [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:45 am
In re Mutyaar Inc., Serial No. 86345866 (February 17, 2016) [not precedential].The Marks: The Board concluded that the marks sound the same and have similar appearances. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:02 am
In re Good Sports Inc., Serial No. 77738935 (July 20, 2011) [not precedential].Being a good sport, Applicant did not dispute that the involved goods are related. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
In re Disney Enterprises, Inc., Serial No. 77235868 (August 12, 2009) [not precedential].Princess TianaOf course the fact that Disney's and Registrant's marks are identical "weighs heavily against the applicant. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
In re Eagle Crest, Inc., Serial No. 77114518 (August 10, 2010) [not precedential].The Board began by observing that "not every designation adopted with the intention that it performs as a trademark and even labeled as a trademark necessarily accomplishes that purpose. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:29 am
Cir. 1988); In re White Jasmine LLC, 106 USPQ2d 1385, 1394 (TTAB 2013) (citing In re Quady Winery, Inc., 221 USPQ 1213, 1214 (TTAB 1984)). [read post]
Citable No. 51: TTAB Upholds 2(d) Refusal of "PSYCHO" for Clothing, But Overturns Mutilation Refusal
6 Dec 2006, 5:11 pm
" In re Big Pig, Inc., Serial No. 78249582 (November 16, 2006).Applicant's specimen of useLikelihood of confusion: Applicant Big Pig, Inc. trotted out what may be the losingest TTAB argument: it attempted to limit the goods of its application and the cited registration by referring to the actual channels of trade and manner of use of the marks. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:04 pm
The case is ELVH, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
In re Jones Investment Co. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:45 am
See In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012) [precedential]. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 11:55 pm
While we’re [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:35 am
Third Circuit, 06/29/2010 In re Goody's Family Clothing Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm
See In re Dolce Vita Footwear, Inc., 2021 USPQ2d 478 (TTAB 2021) [precedential] and In re Dolce Vita Footwear, Inc., 2021 USPQ2d 479 (TTAB 2021) [precedential]. [read post]
