Search for: "In Re Continental Airlines Corp." Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2014, 7:47 am by Jordan Bublick
" In its application of the doctrine of "equitable mootness", the Court looked to the five-factor test set forth in In re Continental Airlines, 91 F.3d 553 (3rd Cir. 1996). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This recent blog from Cooley’s Cydney Posner says that they’re front & center again in 2018. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:24 am by David Lat
His clients include debtors, trustees, bondholders and creditors’ committees in a variety of large, complex proceedings, including Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:13 pm
On this point, see Continental Airlines, Inc. v. continentalairlines.com. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  Corporation with no in-state assets, employees, or registered agent, cannot be at home.In re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc., 745 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:22 am
Dec. 9, 2008). http://tinyurl.com/25fj4b8 In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation, 2009 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Developments in 2011 include new cases, enforcement and legislation in most key areas including abuse of dominance (the Competition Bureau’s ongoing challenge of The Toronto Real Estate Board and CREA settlement in late 2010), criminal conspiracy (developments in price-fixing class action litigation and some Bureau enforcement), refusal to deal (several important private access section 75 cases, including a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal), contested mergers (in the waste and… [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Developments in 2011 include new cases, enforcement and legislation in most key areas including abuse of dominance (the Competition Bureau’s ongoing challenge of The Toronto Real Estate Board and CREA settlement in late 2010), criminal conspiracy (developments in price-fixing class action litigation and some Bureau enforcement), refusal to deal (several important private access section 75 cases, including a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal), contested mergers (in the waste and… [read post]