Search for: "In Re Estate of Sutcliffe"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2008, 2:15 pm
I previously wrote about this case from the perspective of how conflicts of interests can kill you as an estate planner if (a) you're not aware of the issues and (b) you fail to take appropriate precautions [click here]. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, no. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:03 am
When we met three weeks ago, we decided, whatever we're going to do, we're going to be transparent about it. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:41 am
A tricky ethics issue most estate planners contend with on a daily basis (whether they're aware of it or not) is the conflict of interests inherent to jointly representing married couples and/or parents and their children in estate planning. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:34 am
Earlier, I wrote about the 12th annual "Law Firm Leaders Forum" held in San Francisco last week, which I was able to attend as a guest of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, whose Chairman & CEO, Ralph Baxter, has been a sponsor of the event from the beginning. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:15 am
Think your firm isn't re-examining its compensation system? [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 11:41 pm
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, fresh off a round of layoffs two weeks ago, has added five lawyers to its Milan, Italy office. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
But Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe's insistence that it provided proper counsel to a multimillionaire businesswoman was vindicated on Tuesday: A San Francisco superior court jury found Orrick and retired trusts and estates partner William Hoisington not liable for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, according to a statement from the firm's lawyers at Keker & Van Nest. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 1:51 pm
We don’t do real estate, so we have no idea whether the number of conditions is standard or not, but a whole lot has to happen before anyone actually breaks ground. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm
After their sanctions were overturned, the trial court decided they’d had enough and decided not to re-impose. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The lawyers were accused of stealing from the estate of a murder victim by accepting legal fees from his wife, who first inherited her husband's estate but ultimately pleaded guilty to a murder-for-hire plot. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:07 am
Jury Rejects $17 Million Legal Malpractice Claim Against Orrick
The National Law Journal
A San Francisco jury has rejected a $17 million legal malpractice claim against Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe in an eight-year-old dispute claiming breach of fiduciary duty by retired trusts and estates partner William Hoisington. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
“It’s better to cut a deal than go through the pain we have in Vallejo,” says Marc Levinson, a partner with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, which represents the city. [read post]
