Search for: "In Re Federal Coal Company" Results 181 - 200 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2025, 7:46 am by Dan Farber
Chris Wright,, the pick for Energy Secretary, is a fracking company executive and as devoted to fossil fuels as you might expect. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, several recent decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the BJR applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by Eric Hoke, Paralegal
Over the past two years, the United States and Europe have both added more power capacity from renewables than from coal, gas, and nuclear combined, according to the report. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But Much Income from His Family’s Coal Company Isn’t MSN – Michael Kranish and Anna Phillips (Washington Post) | Published: 12/13/2021 In U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 11:40 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:47 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:01 am by LindaMBeale
  That means re-investing in basic science research through NSF and other peer-reviewed governmental funding of basic science. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Click Here Southwest Missouri Pet Supply Dealer to Pay $56,632 Penalty for Re-Labeling, Selling Misbranded Cattle and Hog Insecticide. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm by Steven M. Taber
– Enviro.BLR.com, July 6, 2010 A pipeline company based in Tulsa recently agreed to pay a $418,000 fine in order to resolve violations of the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of the nation’s biggest spenders on federal lobbying, including the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that Uber misrepresented how much its drivers earn when recruiting new drivers, Uber agreed to pay $20 million in a settlement, which also prohibits the company from misrepresenting drivers’ earnings in the future. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
"We're not patent trolls," Michaels said. [read post]