Search for: "In Re Federal Communications Commission, Petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
FCC begins: In 2018, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an order classifying broadband Internet access service as an information service under Title I of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:08 am by Brendan Holland
The Commission is taking additional time to address certain issues raised by petitioners and to revise the new form further. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit vacated key portions of the Federal Communications Commission’s “Open Internet Order” — aka the net neutrality” rule. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
The standard should instead be that the command was taking reasonable efforts to ensure that attorney-client communications were confidential. [read post]
Last week we published an overview of key issues raised by the Federal Communications Commission’s July 10, 2015, Declaratory Ruling and Order regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “July 2015 Order”). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of April 30.  [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’re “Officers. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’re “Officers. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
“In finding petitioners liable for deceptive ads, the Commission determined that petitioners’ efficacy and establishment claims were misleading because they were  unsubstantiated by RCTs. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Institute for Justice Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm   Hart v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
Williams (09-466), below, was re-scheduled for review at the January 22 conference. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:08 pm by Robert Chesney
In that case, we invalidated the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) inter-carrier compensation rules without vacating them because we “believ[ed] that there was a ‘non-trivial likelihood’ that the Commission would be able to state a valid legal basis for its rules” on remand. [read post]