Search for: "In Re Fumo"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 2:00 pm
"Fumo resentenced to 61 months": The Philadelphia Inquirer has this news update. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:05 pm
They're not going to stick to scripted leading questions, not going to only ask Fumo questions to which they already know the answer. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:58 pm
I doubt they'll succeed now, but it's worth reviewing why they're trying. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:58 pm
I doubt they'll succeed now, but it's worth reviewing why they're trying. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:07 pm
They have something else in mind: they’re going to “prove” the case by framing the context and mindset of Fumo’s actions. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:42 am
And, if you're interested in this topic, you can read more about the impact of technology on the practice of law and the legal system at Going Paperless Blog, which I write in my spare time. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
[ping.fm] phillyshortcite: @annereed re [ping.fm] Agreed; jurors entitled to tell others they're on a jury and to describe verdict afterwards. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
As some predicted (post by Max Kennerly predicting that this probably does not warrant a re-trial), Fumo lost. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
It is undeniable that, though a judge may remove a juror from the jury if the juror appears inclined to nullify the law, a judge also may not overturn a jury’s verdict of acquittal and re-try the defendant because of jury nullification. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Mere mortals like Dennis Cogan and Ed Jacobs cannot, not unless they're lucky. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
Fumo, 2008 U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
In When Taxpayers Claim Credits To Which They’re Not Entitled, Who Loses? [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 12:26 pm
Non fumo. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:56 pm
Jurors don't really want to hear your arguments unless they're really novel -- don't be afraid to let them figure some things out on their own. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:41 am
The court affirmed Fumo’s conviction and found that there was no substantial prejudice to Fumo because the juror’s comments on Facebook and Twitter were vague and innocuous. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
Fumo appealed, claiming that was too high a value. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
"If you're not familiar with Twitter, then you're behind the times. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:56 am
In most cases, we’re talking about 6 or 12 jurors on the eventual jury. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 5:43 pm
and don't miss the continuing coverage of Senator Vince Fumo's Criminal Trial. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
It wasn’t just a matter of Fumo’s mansion being of large size in terms of square footage. [read post]
