Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoenas for Documents, Appellant" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
The court begins by explaining that[t]his appeal presents an unusual question of appellate jurisdiction: May we continue to exercise jurisdiction over an appeal of an evidentiary ruling in a grand jury proceeding even after the grand jury has returned both an indictment and a superseding indictment? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Guided by that august adage, we hold that a subpoena duces tecum compelling the production of documents to a now-defunct grand jury cannot be enforced by civil contempt sanctions before a successor grand jury, and we accordingly vacate the district court’s order holding the appellant in civil contempt. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:19 am
On rehearing, a unanimous panel changes course in In re Grand Jury Matter #3, No. 15-2475 (Jan. 27, 2017), holding in this “out-of-lane” case that appellate jurisdiction survived the return of an indictment against a target-turned-defendant challenging a document's presentation to the grand jury. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
In the first case, the Government appealed an adverse ruling on a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by paperstreet
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The most notable is In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kendall Howell
The Eleventh Circuit in In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena (U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
The committee served Mazars with a subpoena for 10 years of Trump’s financial documents on April 15, and Trump sued on April 22. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
If the communication is made to the attorney in her capacity as a business adviser, for example, it ought not be privileged”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 599 F.2d 504, 511 (2d Cir. 1979) (“Participation of the general counsel does not automatically cloak the investigation with legal garb”). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The U.S. itself takes exactly the same position with respect to grand jury subpoenas compelling production of records stored abroad, and (as discussed below) with respect to the SCA provisions compelling production of email data stored abroad. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Ted Folkman
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Dickerson, No. 06-2471 "Conviction and life sentence for drug and weapons offenses are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the specific drug quantities found in the current and previous convictions cannot be utilized for sentencing since the trial judge did not expressly instruct the jury that its findings of drug quantities had to be beyond a reasonable doubt; 2) there was error in the sentencing proceedings concerning defendant's prior convictions because… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
Without further ado: Argument by the Appellant At bottom it’s the government’s appeal, so the United States lawyer Thomas Byron opens. [read post]