Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Doe)" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Jeff Kuntz
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
Although Shabazz involved a subpoena duces tecum issued by a grand jury, we find the reasoning employed by that court in finding the subpoena a valid means of obtaining a saliva sample equally applicable to an LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 66 subpoena duces tecum authorized by a trial court judge. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm by Michael Froomkin
The 11th Circuit just decided In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum March 25, 2011, USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
A cautionary note about raising tribal immunity from a federal subpoena: For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the subpoena duces tecum was unenforceable after the expiration of the issuing grand jury. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
This can be true `whether under a search warrant or a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:29 pm
The government produced evidence suggesting Spadoni's awareness of the comprehensive nature of the subpoenas duces tecum typically issued in federal grand jury investigations. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 7:56 am
In an early computer evidence case - In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 846 F. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
FricosuU.S. v Doe (In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011)Share this:   ||  Join EFF [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm by Samantha Scheller
Similarly, in re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that decryption and production of a hard drive's content triggered the protection of the Fifth Amendment because it would be testimonial. 670 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 3:03 pm
His analysis relied heavily on In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992 (United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm by Orin Kerr
On its face, Section 215 is the authority that is primarily about obtaining physical objects, which would be analogized to the criminal law authority for a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm by Orin Kerr
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, 1346 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]