Search for: "In Re Hartzog" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 3:30 am by Tal Zarsky
Ira Rubinstein & Woodrow Hartzog, Anonymization and Risk, 91 Wash. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:15 pm by Nate Russell
Woodrow Hartzog is an interesting voice on privacy law and technology. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:18 am by Kurt Wimmer
Daniel Solove and Woodrow Hartzog, two of the best thinkers in privacy, have published an impressive volume in the Columbia Law Review called The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:20 am by Cyrus Farivar
After all, speed limits are fairly simple—you’re either driving faster than the posted number or you’re not. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   Woody Hartzog: General questions, such as role of hearer’s skepticism. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:08 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Sprint Nextel Corp.; Oren Bar-Gill & Rebecca Stone, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology); 5. determining whether contracts involving reproductive technologies are enforceable (e.g., In re Baby M; A.Z. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:36 am by David Rossmiller
 (I wrote about In Re Katrina Canal Breaches here, here and here, among other places). [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:02 am by Omer Tene
Creating a mobile architecture that re-delegates permissions by bypassing the restrictions of an operating system? [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 4:27 am by SHG
After all, we’re all different in our own intersectional way, right? [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:04 pm by Woodrow Hartzog
"You can only search for the content people have shared with you," re-emphasized software developer Lars Rasmussen. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm by Eric
* Woodrow Hartzog, Promises and Privacy: Promissory Estoppel and Confidential Disclosure in Online Communities, 82 Temp. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The defendants applied for each claim to be struck out either as an abuse of process or on the basis that the claims disclose no real or substantial tort and the claimant applied to re-amend his Particulars of Claim. [read post]