Search for: "In Re Initiative Measure No. 65" Results 201 - 220 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2009, 12:50 am
This is also a good time for those who "might not have been loving what they do" to re-evaluate and think outside prior limits, says recruiter Stephen D. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:10 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
Finally, the revised REMIT clarifies that its application is without prejudice to MAR, Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (EMIR), Regulation No 600/2014 (MiFIR) and Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID) as regards activities involving financial instruments as well as to the application of the EU competition law. 3. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
 With that in mind we arrived at a tentative answer: yes--but that "yes" requires a re conception of democratic practice in ways alien to liberal democracies that center notions of "representation" and "election" in the construction of their own democratic universe. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” From August to December, SPD ran a TV ad that aired thousands of times on at least 65 different networks and was projected to reach millions of women aged 18–49 each month. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:15 am by Mandelman
  Roughly translated it means… “Yeah, well if you don’t like Obama, I’m sure you’re going to love Mitt Romney. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:44 am by SOIssues
Known as Jessica's Law, the measure increased prison sentences for violent and habitual sex offenders. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Both aggregation and disaggregation of outcomes poses difficult problems for statistical analysis, and for epidemiology. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm
Consumption generally accounts for around 65 percent of GDP in most modern market economies, while investment in fixed assets such as infrastructure and manufacturing capacity makes up 15 percent. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:10 am by Rob Robinson
Regardless of whether you’re a seasoned eDiscovery veteran navigating the shifting sands of the industry, or a newcomer trying to get your bearings in this complex landscape, “Vendor Voices in eDiscovery” serves as your dependable resource. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
  Chapter V Legal Responsibilities; Articles 53-69Provisions sketching out penalties are included (Articles 53-55; 60-65). [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am by Matthias Weller
 30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 3:33 pm by Matthias Weller
 30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:52 am by Matthias Weller
 30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Opt out: biggest is from the Network Advertising Initiative, 65 companies that you can opt out of in a click. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Crane, supra.The Supreme Court then took up the legal issues in the case, explaining, initially, that thePlaintiff acknowledges that there is no New York State precedent to establish a duty that would obligate Cratsley to protect a third party, namely the Plaintiff, from harm. [read post]