Search for: "In Re Interest of Richter"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Phages — they’re viruses — specialized viruses that infect and kill only bacteria and bacteria alone,” Richter explained. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
I started my professional career in advertising but soon realized that I was more interested in how the company ran from a people perspective. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Richter, Mr. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Richter, Mr. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
And if you’re interested in seeing your firm’s listings here, please feel free to reach out… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:28 am
We’re continuing our strong track record of protecting the creative work of artists on YouTube. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
The decision of the court of Justice of the European Union in res Brogsitter has initiated a discussion of its relevance and range to this problem. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am
” Richter v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 11:57 am
With the Omicron wave having washed over the globe in the last five weeks or so, a couple of interesting public health issues have come to the fore. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:03 am
First, the Court of Milan generally highlighted the importance of enforcing SEPs in a way which does not unfairly affect competitors, because general interests, such as guaranteeing a competitive market and the incentive to cultural and scientific progress, would be jeopardised. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:09 am
An interesting question Rather intriguingly, the Consequentials Judgment raises (but does not answer) a “difficult hypothetical question” regarding what would have happened if the trial of the UK proceedings had gone ahead (as it did) but with the oral hearing before the TBA not taking place until the first quarter of 2022. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:41 am
Regular readers of the Blog may be aware of my particular interest in pharma patents and, more especially since the Covid-19 pandemic, for compulsory licensing (see for instance here). [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:26 pm
There may be some haggling about the amount of the winner’s bill (we’re still Dutch), and the court may lower the bill somewhat in view of reasonableness and fairness (not just because we’re Dutch, but because of Art. 14 of the EU Enforcement Directive). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:33 am
Despite several requests from the Staff Representation to be re-involved in the selection procedure (see enclosure), the term of office of the chair and vice-chairs apparently was renewed in October 2020. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 1:33 pm
Despite several requests from the Staff Representation to be re-involved in the selection procedure (see enclosure), the term of office of the chair and vice-chairs apparently was renewed in October 2020. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
In Germany the re-ratification process of the Unified Patent Court Agreement is progressing rapidly, but the threat of new constitutional complaints is looming. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:27 pm
” What is the most interesting case in the SEP area you were involved in yourself? [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:17 am
For instance, the public interest, which is central, is not defined. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:29 pm
It would be challenging for the parties to consider and balance their interests, from a commercial point of view, and decide if it is worth battling to the end. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:48 pm
Experts and interest groups who were asked to take a stand on the draft UPC (re-)ratification bill expressed serious concerns about the uncertainties raising from the Brexit and the German constitutional challenge. [read post]
