Search for: "In Re Interest of ZR"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
Overturning previous precedent, the Supreme Court decided that it was not.What is particularly interesting from the point of view of the place of EPO decisions within European jurisprudence is that it is generally acknowledged that EPO decisions do not create any res judicata. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
The Bundesgerichtshof held that such reports did not infringe the sculptor's privacy sphere ("Privatsphäre") or intimate sphere ("Intimsphäre") as covered by the general personality right under Articles 2(1), 1(1) German Constitution (Grundgesetz). [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:55 pm
The court further stressed that the general public had an information interest. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
This morning the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, the German Federal Court of Justice) has referred not one - but two - copyright cases to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for guidance, respectively, on:To what extent EU copyright allows sampling, ie the taking of part of a sound recording for re-use as an instrument or sound recording in a different song or piece [readers with an interest in hip-hop will know that sampling in this genre… [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
Eleonora Rosati writing on the IPKatThis morning the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, the German Federal Court of Justice) has referred not one - but two - copyright cases to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for guidance, respectively, on:To what extent EU copyright allows sampling, ie the taking of part of a sound recording for re-use as an instrument or sound recording in a different song or piece [readers with an interest in hip-hop will know… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:35 am
While the Fifth Senate had held, in its two infamous Sanssouci decisions from 2011 and 2013 (V ZR 45/10 and V ZR 14/12), that the owner of an immovable object has the right to prevent the exploitation of photographs thereof that could only be taken upon entering the property, the First Senate had, in an earlier decision, implicitly rejected this view (I ZR 54/87). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:45 am
Counsel to Xerox Tanguy de Haan brings to our attention an interesting case from Belgium. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
This GuestKat is particularly interested in the second category. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
Under these circumstances, the defendant’s interest in the publication took precedence over the interests of the defendant’s personality right protection. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:10 am
Once there, customers are able to download the photographs placed in this area to their computers.Some of these photographs were re-uploaded unlawfully by customers onto freely accessible websites. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
This was showcased in 1999 (BGH decision of 1.12.1999 in ZR 49/97), when the German Federal Supreme Court applied the fixed 10 year protection period in a case on damages for the use of image and name of the late German actress Marlene Dietrich.A longer protection of commercial interests was established in 1989 (BGH decision of 8.6.1989 in ZR 135/87). [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
GuestKats and InternKatWe're looking to fill an intern post and are soliciting Expressions of Interest for GuestKat roles! [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The decision further included some interesting findings with regard to the claim for recall of infringing products from the distribution channels. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
I Re-using Amazon item numbers (ASINs) for similar goods can constitute trade mark infringement and passing off [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:46 am
Given the uncertainty surrounding the possibility to apply the principles expressed in UsedSoft to digital subject-matter other than software, the decision of the Court of Appeal of Hamm is particularly interesting, although only available in German. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Mud Buddy, LLC d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing (Docket Report) District Court Utah: Post-motion correction of discovery deficiency warrants sanctions: CleanCut v Rug Doctor et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California answers: May an inventor previously employed by plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest serve as an expert for defendant? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
: CJEU ruling in Stichting De Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee (JIPLP) Finland Finnish ISP ordered to block The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) France Government concludes investigation following anti-piracy data breach (TorrentFreak) Germany Second BGH decision on Google Image search – I ZR 140/10 Vorschaubilder II (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) Netherlands ‘A different perspective on Samsung v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:09 am
But we're talking about runtime technical effects while copyright is about design time and more static than patent law. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:11 am
"There are two interesting points here, Uli tells us:(a) Despite several proceedings pending at before the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the BGH still dares to rule in cases involving adwords. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
The only criteria for inclusion is interest to this particular moggy. [read post]
