Search for: "In Re International Flavors & Fragrances Inc" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 12:26 am
[www.nylj.com] International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., plaintiff-appellant v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 5:09 am
" 172 USPQ at 397.The Board noted that the more recent phantom mark ruling in In re International Flavors and Fragrances Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513 (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
E.g., In re Int’l Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 183 F.3d 1361, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
" (quoting In re International Flavors and Fragrances Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
"The Examining Attorney asserted that "'Phantom marks,' or marks that include an element that is subject to change, are unregistrable because they include more than a single mark," citing In re International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513 (Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:42 am by Stark & Stark
Applying this test to the facts before it, the court concluded that the sale of mercury-tainted vanilla beans to International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
American Medical Systems, Inc., 958 F. [read post]