Search for: "In Re Interstate Power Co."
Results 201 - 210
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:06 pm
Those powers include revenue from parking tickets, the ability to decide which parking spaces will be metered, those meters' hours of operation, and the rates for those meters, says Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman public finance partner Lewis Greenbaum, who serves as co-bond counsel to the City of Chicago. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Riggi, No. 061280 Conviction on charges arising out of involvement in an organized crime family, including racketeering, murder and related conspiracies, is vacated and remanded where admission of eight plea allocutions of non-testifying co-conspirators amounted to plain error under the intervening authority of Crawford v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
The court rejected it more or less out of hand:We find that Congress has not exceeded its authority in this case, where there can be no question of the interstate character of the industry in question and where Congress rationally perceived a substantial effect on the industry of the litigation that the Act seeks to curtail.Slip op. at 18.The second anti-tort reform argument is that passing a statute barring already filed lawsuits violated "separation of powers" because… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
" NFP civil opinions today (4): In Re the Guardianship of M.E.T., a Protected Person v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
"Similarly, Judge Jenkins noted that California's claims implicated Congress's powers over both interstate commerce and foreign policy. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 9:01 am
At the very least, this liberal conventional wisdom recommends rejection of Choice B, deemed to be a naked power grab by Republicans. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
They're not as powerful as straight preemption, but in some situations they might have more appeal.The first of these is what we call judicial deference. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., 464 F. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Another glossary of legal terms in family law cases: SOURCE: Montgomery Law Ab Initio: Latin for "from the beginning. [read post]
