Search for: "In Re Interstate Power Co."
Results 121 - 140
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The law of interstate marriage recognition has developed solely on the principle of comity, or respect, for sister states. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
See, e.g., Buckman Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:37 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
President Obama announced his support for gay marriage before winning re-election in November 2012, and still won. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
For trade names we don’t have the concept that protection needs to be throughout the entire territory—they can be local and co-exist. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:01 pm
Although the FDA has no power over state laws pertaining to raw milk, it does have the authority to ban interstate sales of raw milk, an action it took in 1987 with an eye on preventing disease outbreaks linked to raw milk. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
The pair concerns whether the federal government has the power effectively to override a state governor’s decision not to allow a requested state-prisoner custody transfer under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
Feinstein mobilized opposition to this amendment, leading a letter to the Senate Agriculture Committee leadership co-signed by 15 of her fellow Senators urging rejection of the provision in a final Farm Bill or any other vehicle. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., 852 F. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:51 am
Supreme Court, Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The most notable is In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
MICHELLE VANALSTINE and MATTHEW VANALSTINE, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of CHARLES VANALSTINE, Appellants, v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:31 am
The Court looked for evidence of, for example, diverted non-U.S. sales, or re-entry of goods into the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
The “inactivity” argument leveled at the individual mandate is nothing more than an attempt to re-introduce formalistic rules designed to limit the scope of Congress’ delegated power. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
We’re victims, too! [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
Federal child labor laws before FDR’s appointees took over the Supreme Court: constitutionally questionable as an exercise of the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm
Federal child labor laws before FDR’s appointees took over the Supreme Court: constitutionally questionable as an exercise of the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233; Lovell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
To be fair, the words of the President, keeping in mind he is the head of the Executive Branch, attacking the power of a co-equal branch of government, in this instance the Judicial Branch, are not unprecedented nor constrained to one political party. [read post]
