Search for: "In Re Jersey Materials Co." Results 161 - 180 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It seems like the kind of case Sherri Shepherd and her co-hosts on The View might have discussed on the air, alternating inflammatory and judgmental tones. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  We assume they’re equally serious across the board, but maybe not. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:05 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
He is co-chair of the ABA Probate & Estate Planning Law Committee of the American Bar Association Solo Small Firm Division. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:42 am by Schachtman
Bristol-Myers Squibb sought and obtained a commission in state court (New Jersey) cases for a Massachusetts’ subpoena for Garrido’s underlying data late in1997. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
Getting to engage in that process for myself-- editing, doing research, and contributing material of my own-- was even better. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Companies must also document their compliance efforts and report material changes affecting their obligations to the agency. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:28 am
Unlike general population, where I was allowed to go to the law library and get the materials I needed, I was required to send a note stating what materials I needed, and a law clerk would come around and bring the materials. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am by Venkat Balasubramani
I don’t know if this is a material difference from a First Amendment standpoint but it’s a difference worth noting: there was never an overt expression of intent to cause physical harm in this case. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm by Roy Black
His later books regurgitated some of the same material, but I read them anyway. [read post]